|
|||||
|
10-09-08 Update
October 9, 2008
NNSA Approves Final Analysis of Plan To Transform and Downsize Nuclear Weapons Complex WASHINGTON, D.C. – The head of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced today that he has approved the final environmental analysis of his plan to transform the aging, Cold War-era nuclear weapons complex into a 21st century national security enterprise. The analysis contains NNSA’s preference – or preferred alternative – for the future of the enterprise. "The world is changing and we are changing along with it," said NNSA Administrator Thomas D’Agostino. "The number of U.S. nuclear weapons is shrinking, budgets are flat or declining, and we need a smaller, more secure, more efficient infrastructure that reflects these realities, and yet retains our essential capabilities and enables our workforce to perform this vital mission." The environmental analysis, or Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (SPEIS), analyzed several different options for the future of the nuclear weapons complex. One of those options outlines D’Agostino’s preference for transformation and would consolidate missions and facilities within the existing NNSA sites, known as distributed centers of excellence. While not eliminating any sites, NNSA would eliminate redundancies in missions, capabilities, and facilities at all of them, eventually saving money in the future. In December 2007, D’Agostino announced the draft SPEIS. Since that announcement, thousands of citizens attended more than 80 hours of public hearings and provided more than 600 oral comments regarding the proposed transformation plan. During the public comment period there were a total of 20 public hearings over a 36 day span at NNSA sites and other locations. In total, NNSA received over 100,000 comments. NNSA officials went through each comment while preparing the final SPEIS. The final preferred actions, based on public comments, outside reviews and environmental and socioeconomic analyses include:
A summary of the preferred alternative and other information on the proposal can be found at:
|
|||||
|
|
|||||